Under the constitutions supremacy clause, the new york monopoly was void because it. Take five minutes and fill your head with tales of the interstate commerce clause and this foundational constitutional defining supreme court case. By applying the commerce clause of the constitution, the court set a key precedent for federal authority. Appeal from the court for the trial of impeachments and correction of errors of the state of newyork. The remedy is as summary as the grant itself is ample. Ogden filed suit against gibbons in new york state court, and received a permanent injunction the new york state court rejected gibbons argument asserting that u. This month we spotlight one of the earliest cases exploring the division between state and federal power. The part of the ruling which stated that any license granted under the federal coasting act of 1793 takes precedence over. In 1824, new york created a law that granted aaron ogden a monopoly over steamboat access to. John marshall chief justice ruled for gibbons gibbons won because the federal licensing act of 1793 was violated when ogden was given an exclusive grant from. Ogden established the principle that states cannot pass laws that interfere with the power of congress to regulate interstate commerce. Later, these men transferred their right to a man named ogden.
Ogden is a 1824 landmark case of the supreme court of the united states, which gave congress complete power in regulating interstate commerce. Ogden in 1824 brought into sharp relief the ongoing tugofwar for power between individual states and the federal government. And marshalls analysis of the commerce clause in gibbons. These exclusive rights had been granted by the state of new york. The case gave more specific meaning to commerce and changed the division of power between the federal and state governments. Ogden, law, and society in the early republic examines a landmark decision in american jurisprudence, the first. Thomas gibbons the vote of the ruling was unanimous. Congress power to regulate within its sphere is exclusive. Ogden p brought this lawsuit seeking an injunction to restrain gibbons d from operating steam ships on new york waters in violation of his exclusive privilege. The act established firm amounts which farmers could produce in a given year. In 1824, new york created a law that granted aaron ogden a monopoly over steamboat access to the hudson river. The state of new york had authorized a monopoly on steamboat operation in state waters, and this action was upheld by a state chancery court.
Ogden found himself competing with thomas gibbons, who had been given permission to use the waterways by the federal government. A ferry boat operator gibbons was given an exclusive license by the state of new york to run a ferry from new york city to new jersey. In this commerce clause case, the supreme court affirmed congresss power to regulate interstate commerce, and held that by virtue of the supremacy clause, state laws must yield to constitutional acts of congress. In response, ogden filed suit in the state court of chancery to enjoin gibbons from operating his steamboat in state waters. When thomas gibbons operated steamboats in ogdens route in 1819, ogden sued gibbons. Ogden was a supreme court case dealing with interstate commerce. The appellant brought suit before the new york court requesting to prohibit gibbons to operate boats in the waters under new york regulation. The commerce clause gives congress authority over interstate navigation. The state of new york agreed in 1798 to grant robert fulton and his backer, robert r. Reading take your boat and go home in 1803, the state of new york passed a law giving two men, livingston and fulton, the right to be the only ones allowed to operate steamboats in new york waters. Gibbons was given permission from the united states congress, in contrast, ogden received a license under state law. Ogden 1824, decided 35 years after the ratification of the constitution, was a key turning point for the expansion of federal power to address national problems.
Ogden was given an exclusive license, pursuant to a new york statute, to run a ferry between new york and new jersey. Gibbons obtained a license, pursuant to federal law, to run a ferry in new york waters, thus, running in interference with ogden s license. Congress passed the agriculture adjustment act in 1938, which established a quota system for the amount of wheat that could be placed into interstate commerce between states and established penalties for violation. The case questioned whether or not the state of new york could regulate interstate commerce typically congress right. This bundle contains 11 readytouse gibbons v ogden worksheets that are perfect for students who want to learn more about gibbons v ogden which was a landmark case of the united states supreme court decided in 1824. Ogden was the first case of its kind to address the commerce clause of the constitution and had no precedents. The state of new york passed a law to grant a steamboat operation monopoly between new york and new jersey. The monopoly was granted to robert fulton and robert livingston, who licensed a new jersey steamboat operator, aaron ogden, to run a ferry between new york city and elizabeth point in new jersey. The issue arose when gibbons operated another steamboat on ogdens route. His competitor ogden was licensed as a vessel in the coasting trade under a statute enacted by congress. Thomas gibbons a steamboat owner who did business between new york and new jersey under a federal coastal license formed a partnership with ogden, which fell apart after three years when gibbons operated another steamboat on a new york route belonging to ogden.
Livingston and robert fulton the exclusive right of navigating the waters of that state with steamboats are in collision with the acts of congress regulating the coasting trade, which, being made in pursuance of the constitution, are supreme. Gibbons v ogden 1824 in 1807, aaron ogden purchased exclusive rights to operate steamboats between new york city and new jersey from mr fulton and mr livingston. Commerce clause to the supreme courts decision in cooley v. The ferry boat operator filed suit when a competing boat began to operate a similar service in the. The group was not only doing religious missionary work but was also giving the cherokee advice on how to resist georgia state laws. Both gibbons plaintiff and ogden defendant operated steamboats in new york in an effort to regulate coastal trade. Ogden, the scotus reestablished congress power over interstate commerce and reinforced the constitution as the supreme law of the land. A group of white missionaries, which included samuel worcester, were doing missionary work in cherokee territory in the state of georgia.
Gibbons v ogden legal definition of gibbons v ogden. For more information on the gibbons v ogden case read the fact file below or download our comprehensive worksheet pack to utilise within the classroom or home environment. Aaron ogden had a license from the state of new york to navigate between new york city and the new jersey shore. Before the lopez litigation, no reported decision of any american. The new york legislature enacted a statute granting fult. Congress power to regulate interstate commerce does not stop at the external boundary line of a state. Ogden the case 1824 erica turner background of the prosecution the supreme court had to decide who has the ultimate power to decide how interstate commerce is conducted.
Apr 11, 2014 take five minutes and fill your head with tales of the interstate commerce clause and this foundational constitutional defining supreme court case. Ogden 1977 is available for free download at the internet archive summary of gibbons v. Supreme court in 1824, was a major step in the expansion of the power of the federal government to deal with challenges to u. Supreme court case decided in 1819, in which the court affirmed the constitutional doctrine of congress implied powers. Maryland of march 6, 1819, was a seminal supreme court case that affirmed the right of implied powers, that there were powers that the federal. When thomas gibbons tried to start a rival service, ogden sued, claiming his rights were being violated.
Ogden filed suit against gibbons in new york state court, and received a. Ogden 1824 in 1824, the state government of new york state allowed for 2 men robert fulton and robert livingston to maintain the authority to regulate the waterways existing between new york and new jersey. This meant that under new york law, nobody could operate. Supreme court case establishing the principle that states cannot, by legislative enactment, interfere with the power of congress to regulate commerce. Gibbons v ogden was a landmark case of the united states supreme court decided in 1824. Ogden 1824 background summary and questions the case of gibbons v. Presents a conflict between the states and congress over the authority to regulate.
564 1364 66 1189 1410 1470 1456 1097 1390 822 893 1380 991 297 211 1046 690 731 1432 1011 1414 754 594 845 299 467 279 132 895 1298 1100 123 306 931 1024